Teaching Us to Read Again

Check out this graphic resource on eReaders
Created by: www.OnlineTeachingDegree.com I received a very nice email from Online Teaching Degree.com directing me to this graphic, with an invitation to share. We are currently a three-Kindle house, and I don't imagine we're ever going to leave eReaders. While I don't think they are the be-all and end-all, they are certainly a very useful tool. We still check out a LOT of books from the library, but I'm sure we'll gradually shift to more etexts as the Overdrive program picks up. As for the kids: while they're thrilled they can store MP3s on their Kindles, the biggest change in reading I've noticed is that they are much quicker to read classics. They're all free, and instantly available, and they don't look outdated (I'm just guessing at reasons, here). Sure, I'm a book-intensive parent, but I wouldn't have expected a ten-year-old to try Shakespeare.

Reading Intersects with Life Sometimes

My state legislators have spent the past session ignoring the compelling problems such as unemployment, foreclosures, steep funding cuts to schools, and lack of access to health care, issues that make lives difficult every day. Instead they addressed the non-problem of domestic unions. An amendment has been proposed,

Constitutional amendment to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this State

It is expected that the amendment will not receive sufficient votes in May to be enacted. Should it win the vote, it would be challenged on constitutional grounds, a contest it would not win, but which would cost the state a great deal of time and money. It is pointless, since there is already a law on the books forbidding gay marriage.

So why propose it? I can think of no good reason. When my daughters asked about it, the best explanation I could give them is that some people wish to legislate away that which they do not like. That isn't adequate, though, because that law was already passed. This is about depriving citizens of their rights. My town is one of several in the state which is offering the same benefits to spouses and domestic partners. The amendment's purpose is to permanently assign a less-than status to any domestic arrangement other than heterosexual marriage. It is an effort to strip citizens of some of their rights, which in my opinion is the worst thing a law can do. "It is mean," I told my children.

 But I wondered, why, if I feel so strongly about this am I not putting up a yard sign, or writing letters to the editor? The answer, at lest in part, is that I had a hard time articulating why this is wrong. I felt that it was, but was unable to express why. I could think of numerous examples, showing that to take away the rights of some people was one step towards greater atrocities, but "because Nazis" is not a reasonable argument.

And then, off a stack of books waiting their turn for my attention, I pulled The Pox Party. My daughter probably loaned it to me a year ago, but I hadn't even looked closely at the cover. Octavian is a slave who is being raised in a learned home with all the advantages save one. As a child his lack of freedom isn't very noticeable, for what child isn't constrained by the adults around them? As Octavian grows, and learns, and suffers, the reader feels his pain. This, truly is a fate worse than death because it never ends. Moreover, it taints and corrupts everyone. As slavery goes, one can't help thinking that Octavian has it pretty good: he is well fed, richly clothed, educated. What Anderson shows us is that without freedom even "pretty good" is horrific. Slavery infects the social interactions between Octavian and everyone else. It creates an imbalance of power that weighs down Octavian. He is surrounded by scientists, well-intentioned and sometimes even kind, not a one of whom can think straight, because of this huge, glaring WRONG that is ongoing every minute. Slavery is wrong because it denies the humanity of the one enslaved, but it also steals the humanity of everyone who goes along with it. Everyone is lying, denying what they see in order to support a system that they cannot see a way around. Everyone is constantly being tested as to how they will treat their neighbor, and everyone is found wanting. The truth of slavery is ugly.

 So here is my understanding, after reading this astonishing book: In order to be humane, we must recognize the humanity in others, and address it. Therefor, any effort to deny the humanity of others, such as, by stripping them of any of their rights, is not only to do a violence to them, but also to that which is humane within oneself. The only thing which makes any of us "good" is the effort to do good to others.

When Joel Stein, professional columnist, writes that Adults Should Read Adult Books, one might be tempted to dismiss him as a cranky snob who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. And that's true, of course, since among other things, he seems to believe that animated films are exclusively made for children. But he's not just a cranky, ignorant, snob. Look:

Let’s have the decency to let tween girls have their own little world of vampires and child wizards and games you play when hungry. Let’s not pump Justin Bieber in our Saabs and get engaged at Cinderella’s Castle at Disneyland.

[emphasis added] He's also a misogynist. What really annoys him, apparently, is the idea of adult men condescending to the level of tween girls. No where in the short piece does he worry about what's popular with tween boys, and although he uses adult in a presumably gender-neutral way, the only pronouns he uses are masculine. Both Time and the NYT would be better served by hiring a ten year old girl to write for them. My daughter's spelling is atrocious, but at least she makes sense.

Random House Hates Libraries, Too

...And is bravely willing to treble their prices for ebooks when library budgets are cut to the bone. I have to admit, it takes nerve to markup prices 300%

How Do You Get Your Kids to Love Reading?

Yesterday I was asked that question elseweb. The true answer is "I don't know." It may be that I have done some things right, or I may have done everything wrong, and they just loved reading anyway. Who knows? When I was a kid I was small, and sickly with allergies and undiagnosed asthma, an Air Force brat who moved around a lot and spent a number of years living in the middle of nowhere. I taught myself to read early, and my parents were happy to keep me supplied with material.

My kids, however, are nothing like that.

So, here's what I did, which you may use, ignore, or argue about.

1) I got them each a library card when they were still babies. I used their cards to check out slews of board books, which I then read to them. I also read aloud to them from whatever I was enjoying at the time, so the first book Veronica ever heard was Good Omens when she was mere days old.

2) I take them to the library every week; library night usually includes a visit to a playground and/or dinner out at someplace they like to eat. When they were tiny we went for storytime, now we're also likely to show up for some Shakespeare, or maybe a movie. We know all the librarians, and they know us. Often we run into friends and acquaintances. We participate in the summer reading program every year. When the new library opened, my mother donated a brick with our names for the sidewalk. We're invested.

3) I read to them as much as they want, still, including snuggling and sometimes staying up a little later. they get on either side of me on the sofa, and these days they're likely to be making friendship bracelets while I read, but we're cozy and together.

4) While I usually won't join them in watching TV, I'm always happy to make room for someone to read next to me. We do this even more than the reading aloud. The girls will take turns on the computer, with the other one on the sofa with me and some cats. We all feel free to share something particularly amusing or cool.

5) No judgement. Reading for fun should be fun, which may include magazines, comic books, facts and trivia, blogs, romances, whatever. No concern about reading levels or age-appropriateness. Free rein. I've never insisted they (or me, when I'm reading aloud) have to finish anything that wasn't fun. I've always got lots of suggestions for something else to read. They see me reading pretty much everything: history, romance, cartoons, classics, picture books. It's all good.

6) When I'm not reading, I'm talking about books. My go-to conversational gambit is "read anything good lately?" It works for friends, family, strangers, young and old. And I've gotten some great suggestions. A while back friends married in a small informal ceremony. It was great. One of the things they did was make up name tags for everyone that identified our relationship to the bride or groom, and suggest topics of conversation. Yeah, mine mostly just said "books" and I wore it with pride.

7) I take them to book reading/signings and I buy them autographed books. I point them to authors they've liked who blog or Twitter. I tried to hook them on GoodReads but they declined. The point is, with a lot of this as I reflect, it's about how reading is a solitary activity, but "being a reader" is very social. They've both participated in the Battle of the Books, as part of a team answering questions about books and competing within the school.

So, this is how that all plays out in real life: Last night was library night. We picked out books for fun and for a school project. We all wrote and posted answers to the question on the teen room board ("Which book character would you least like to be trapped in an elevator with?"). We picked up bookmarks telling us how to download library books to the kindle (Curse you six publishers!Yes, I'm bitter) and we discussed how some publishers weren't participating with a librarian. We went out to dinner, talking about books all the way. And then, because we live in a part of the country that pays a lot of attention to college basketball, we talked about brackets and online sweet sixteen competitions. And then we each came up with a literary list for our own playoffs.

Really, I have no idea what makes them readers, nature, nurture, peer pressure. I'm just very lucky to share that with them.

An Open Letter to Some Publishers, AKA Library Haters

Specifically, to
Macmillan Publishing: customerservice@mpsvirginia.com
Simon & Schuster http://www.simonandschuster.com/about/contact_us
Penguin Group: ecommerce@us.penguingroup.com,
Brilliance Audio: consumerhelp@brillianceaudio.com
Hachette Book Group: http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/customer_contact-us.aspx

You don't know me. At all. I am just one of many nameless readers. And you have just gotten on my last nerve by cutting off your ebooks from libraries.

I hear that publishing is going through a hard time right now, suffering a precipitous decline in hardcover and paperback book sales. As I understand it, the only areas experiencing growth are YA and ebook sales. So what do you do in this situation? You screw over the entire ereader market and the younger reader segment, who particularly love ereaders.

Me, I read about a book a day, which is excessive. Because I'm not a reviewer, or a popular blogger, I don't receive advance reading copies of the books I read, although our favorite writer Lauren sometimes lets me read her manuscripts-in-progress (the girls and I are really enjoying the new one, by-the-bye). Most of those books I read are borrowed from the library. Now this is the part that is going to shock you: I also buy a lot of books. Apparently it hasn't occurred to y'all that a reader would use the library and also buy books. Some of my friends like to listen to audio books, too. Because, readers like books. Turns out, I'm not the only one
.

Allow me to reiterate: people who use the library are not some special, separate subset. They are people who like to read books. Sometimes they buy, sometimes they borrow, sometimes the swap with friends and family, sometimes they are reduced to reading the cereal box if there is nothing else available. That you haven't already figured this out explains your recent problems. As well as your very public failure to recognize this. For example, you haven't figured out yet who the people are who love ereaders. They are readers. Here's something else you don't know about the people who loves ereaders: they tend to be younger. Turns out kids who don't have credit cards or drivers licenses really enjoy being able to download books, just as they do every other form of entertainment they enjoy, all without having to beg someone else for a ride. Remember, YA and ebooks, the only two growing segments of books sales. My kids love the Kindle. And the Hunger Games. And the library. See how it all ties together?

Oh, and doesn't it seem like a major public relations fiasco, positioning yourselves against public libraries during an international financial crisis? Doesn't it seem a little one percent-ish going out of your way to sneer at the public at large as well as the people who are temporarily unemployed, who have too much time and worry and not enough money? Isn't it a little short-sighted to deprive the public of books when they most need them just because you don't like the arrangement with Amazon?

Now I will mock you mercilessly for being some of the stupidest people ever, but I can do that from a position of comfort. Your decision won't hurt me. Right now, the list of books I want to read has 18,059 titles on it. By the end of the day, it'll be longer. When my library doesn't have a copy of one of your books that I can check out for my Kindle, I'll just move it to the end of my list. It's not as if another million books won't be published in the next year, most of which will be available.

Look, on the one hand you clearly realize that library users are also book-buyers, that is to say, readers, and you're worried about losing sales if it's too easy to check-out a book for free. But all you have to do is think this through to know that it's wrong. How many used copies of The Catcher in the Rye are available on Amazon right now for $.01? You can't walk into any used bookstore or library without finding a copy, probably many, and yet, people still buy new ones. All you're doing is pissing off the readers who, due to bad economy, layoffs, etc. are relying on their cash-strapped public libraries even more than usual, a group who will remember this when they can buy books again, and you're alienating the heaviest readers who considered a hundred bucks for a device worthwhile because they already spend too much on books. And since the early ereader adopters are also the folks enjoying YA, whether or not they are YA, you're burning the only growing segment of the book-buying public. Seriously, by the time my kids get to college, the probably won't read anything that isn't available on their pads.

I honestly wonder about the wisdom of your organizations. Has it escaped your notice that instant availability of films and TV programs has been an enormous financial boon to studios? Did you not notice how, first with tapes, then with discs, now with instant downloads, the studios are making increasing gobs of money? Why in hell would you look to emulate an industry like music, who fought availability of digital content every step of the way and discovered that people actively enjoyed screwing them out of their royalties?

Why do you have to hate on the libraries? Couldn't you just go and kick some puppies, instead?

Hat tip: 100 Scope Notes